Illinois Supreme Court hears arguments in pension case
Illinois Supreme Court hears arguments in pension case
Does the Illinois Constitution’s pension clause spell disaster for the state?
Does the Illinois Constitution’s pension clause spell disaster for the state?
Local governments should structure themselves in a way that best meets the needs of their budget, taxpayers and public employees. And the state should give them the power to do so.
Missing from the discussion on state revenues is what happened with all the money from Illinois’ last major tax hike.
Unfunded pension debt for police and fire pension funds in Wilmette has increased by 16 percent since 2009.
The plaintiffs in the SB 1 case are asking the court to do something extraordinary: to hold, in effect, that pension benefits should receive stronger protection than any other type of constitutional right.
Since 2009, taxpayer contributions to police and fire pensions in Springfield have increased by 44 percent.
Morton Grove's police pension fund has just 54 cents of every dollar it needs in the bank today to meet future pension payments.
Whether they realize it or not, taxpayers in Arlington Heights have a lot of experience with the impact of rising pension costs.
Local governments have their hands tied when it comes to pension reform.
Former Gov. Pat Quinn contributed less than $200,000 to his retirement, but is set to draw more than $2 million in pension benefits over his lifetime.
Numerous U.S. pension plans are in deep, deep trouble, and Illinois is at the top of the list. Plan assumptions cannot and will not be met.
Baby boomers have saddled young Illinoisans with a grossly unfair burden.
Chicago’s credit rating trails only Detroit among major U.S. cities.